Police Surveillance Debate, Water Rules, and Digital Equity

The Durham City Council hears sharp public criticism over meeting conduct, questions about COVID relief funding, and extensive opposition to a proposed Peregrine police surveillance contract, followed by the police chief and mayor defending the technology and their approach to public safety. The council also digs into security upgrades in public housing, state-driven Falls and Jordan Lake nutrient rules affecting development, and Durham’s community-wide push to close the digital divide. 33mins

Was this helpful?

Original Meeting

Thursday, January 22nd, 2026
16176.0
Durham City Council Work Session January 22, 2026
Video Notes

2:25 p.m. update: The Work Session has now resumed with video and audio now working properly. Thank you for your patience!

---------------------------------------

2:10 p.m. update: Audio has now been restored to all of our broadcast and livestream feeds. Work Session will resume once the City Council returns from their Closed Session. Thank you for your patience.

----------------------------------------

1:45 p.m. update: The Work Session is now in recess while we reboot our video system, which we hope will restore audio to our broadcast and livestream feeds. This will take approximately 20-30 minutes. Thank you for your patience.

------------------------------------------

1:20 p.m. update: We are troubleshooting audio issues now. Please standby and thank you for your patience.

Welcome to the City Council Work Session for January 22, 2026.

Agenda: https://www.durhamnc.gov/AgendaCenter/City-Council-4

How to participate: https://www.durhamnc.gov/1345

Contact the City Council: https://www.durhamnc.gov/1323

NOTE: Comments left on this livestream will not be read or entered into the meeting record.

Call to Order / No Audio

Roll Call / No Audio

Announcements by Council / No Audio

Priority Items by the City Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk / No Audio

Closed Session / Audio Troubleshooting

Administrative Consent Items

Citizens’ Matters

Pulled Items

9. Second Amendment to Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with the Housing Authority of the City of Durham to Procure and Install Security Equipment

10. Contract with Peregrine Technologies, Inc to Procure an Operations Management Platform for Durham City Police

Presentations

12. Digital Equity Plan Update [30 minutes]

13. Falls Lake Nutrient Strategy Rules Overview Presentation [20 Minutes]

Settling the Agenda

Other Matters

Adjournment

avatar
Wes Platt
Durham, NC
Neighborhood news guy for Southpoint Access in Durham.
View full bio
In This Video
  • Jacqueline Wagstaff criticized the Mayor and council members for what was described as hypocritical and embarrassing behavior in how they disciplined both the public and fellow council members during meetings.
  • Victoria Peterson questioned how COVID relief funds and related earnings were managed, calling for transparency about which organizations received money, how much was spent, and whether any groups were still awaiting funds.
  • Victoria Peterson urged city officials and the Housing Authority to clarify which public housing communities would receive security upgrades, what specific equipment would be installed, and why cameras would not be placed directly in units if they were excluded.
  • Council Member Cook asked the Durham Housing Authority’s chief operating officer to clarify the purpose of a funding item, and the official explained that participatory budgeting dollars were awarded for cameras, locks, new door hardware, and lighting at the Pridgen Place and Cornwallis Road communities.
  • Participatory budgeting staff and the Durham Housing Authority’s chief operating officer explained that resident-initiated funding for lighting, security cameras, and bolt locks required additional contingency funds and a switch from reimbursement to upfront payment, which contributed to implementation delays.
  • The Durham Housing Authority’s chief operating officer detailed the infrastructure and cellular service needs for new elevator cameras, noting there would be ongoing costs that DHA was evaluating to absorb so the city would not be responsible for maintenance expenses.
  • A citizen urged the council to reject a proposed contract with Peregrine Technologies, warning that the software would expand surveillance of residents—especially Black and immigrant communities—and calling instead for investment in housing, youth programs, and other community services.
  • A speaker opposed the Peregrine Technologies contract, arguing that its predictive policing tools would reinforce racial bias and allow warrantless access to extensive camera and personal data across the city.
  • Shanice Hamilton opposed spending $500,000 on Peregrine surveillance technology for the police department, arguing the funds should instead support affordable housing and HEART program expansion and raising concerns about the company’s ties to Palantir and immigration enforcement.
  • A resident opposed the Peregrine contract by warning that it would compound existing police use of data-scraping tools like Tangles and demanded that the council reject the deal, halt the Real Time Crime Center, explain existing license plate reader agreements, and publicly disclose all law enforcement technology contracts and MOUs.
  • Chief Patrice Andrews responded to criticism of police technology by condemning what was described as widespread disinformation about DPD, sharing the emotional toll of homicide investigations, and explaining that the tools were intended to speed investigations, reduce crime, and let community members submit their own video evidence.
  • The Police Chief emphasized the department’s transparency in sharing data, rejected claims that the city manager had signed an MOU with a license plate reader company, clarified that DPD only had a basic agreement with Flock rather than a paid, top-tier contract, and noted the department still found value in Flock systems used by private entities and neighborhoods.
  • The Police Chief urged council members to base their decision on factual information rather than bias or hearsay, noting that the proposal was being scrutinized primarily because it came from the Police Department and adding that while they would soon leave the role, they planned to remain an engaged Durham resident.
  • Mayor Williams asserted that council members were elected to serve the entire city rather than specific groups, emphasized a leadership style focused on candor over likability, and acknowledged that personal demeanor and identity could make some people uncomfortable.
  • Mayor Williams acknowledged that an earlier aggressive push for ShotSpotter had been misguided, emphasized that no single strategy or tool would solve violent crime, and criticized repeated calls for task forces and commissions that were seen as obstructing efforts to act on crime reduction measures.
  • Mayor Williams stated strong support for approving the police technology contract, citing trust in staff’s vetting of software options and framing the tool as one component of a broader collaboration to improve public safety.
  • Michelle Wolfoke outlined how the state’s Falls Lake nutrient rules were structured in two stages, explained that local governments were implementing the existing state strategy rather than a city-specific one, and noted that this approach helped avoid stricter federal requirements for impaired water bodies, previewing a similar framework for future Jordan Lake work.
  • Michelle Wolfoke explained that Falls Lake nutrient rules relied on a chlorophyll a standard and a 2006 baseline year that turned out to be atypical due to surrounding drought years, which is why the rules allowed for reexamining the underlying science and updating analytical tools.
  • Michelle Wolfoke cautioned that water quality models were inherently imperfect, explained that chlorophyll a standards and post-2006 nutrient reduction efforts would be reevaluated to ensure local governments receive appropriate credit, and noted that the state rules were designed to be revisited and revised after 10 years.
  • Michelle Wolfoke explained that new development in Durham must include long-term stormwater controls and meet a stringent phosphorus limit that often forces projects to buy scarce offset credits, noting that state rules for new development—especially in Falls Lake and Jordan Lake—were frequently revised and likely to change again after 2027.
  • Michelle Wolfoke explained that reducing nitrogen and phosphorus from already developed areas was an expensive and scientifically uncertain responsibility placed on the city, and described how early rules required local governments to quantify nutrient reductions from stormwater controls using difficult and often inaccurate calculation methods.
  • Michelle Wolfoke explained that growing wastewater flows from regional development were straining existing nitrogen and phosphorus discharge limits, leading local governments to seek additional treatment capacity in exchange for greater investment in watershed projects, even though those projects did not provide a one-to-one nutrient offset.
  • A speaker from Digital Durham described how the nonprofit helped develop a community-endorsed digital equity plan and highlighted that Durham had been repeatedly recognized by the National Digital Inclusion Association as a digital inclusion trailblazer, including visionary status as the only municipality in North Carolina to receive that designation.
  • A speaker highlighted that digital equity efforts aimed to support residents’ economic prosperity, reporting that about 94% of Durham County households had adopted broadband while noting ongoing challenges such as households having too few devices for work, school, and daily tasks.
  • A speaker emphasized that digital access alone was insufficient without navigation and job-related skills, suggested that income gaps partly stemmed from differences in digital skills, and noted that community-based organizations in Durham had expanded efforts to address these skill needs.
  • A speaker stressed that successfully advancing digital equity required faithfully implementing the community plan, maintaining accountability, and ensuring long-term program stability so residents could build trust in the city’s commitment to their interests.
Your Governments
Your governments list is empty.