Solon Council Approves Garage Variance, Tables Rezoning Question Amid Ward Veto Debate

The Solon City Council hears neighbors clash over a Somerset Drive garage setback, drainage concerns, and the precedent variances set for future development, then turns to heated charter discussions on the ward veto, residential rezoning powers, and the city’s remaining green space. Council also adjusts the master plan timeline, responds to community worries about e-bikes, and recognizes long-term public service and resident generosity. 34mins

Was this helpful?

Original Meeting

Monday, August 3rd, 2026
5612.0
Council - August 3, 2026
In This Video
  • A resident addressed City Council to describe confusion and disappointment over a revised side setback variance request and expressed concern about the precedent it could set for future development in their neighborhood.
  • A resident outlined ongoing concerns about drainage and stormwater management for a variance project, requested detailed review and written assurances on plans to prevent impacts to their property, and highlighted stress caused by limited transparency while the Law Director cautioned against relying on “trust me” assurances.
  • A resident urged Council to rescind its vote to place possible removal of the ward veto on the ballot, arguing the veto had served as an important check and balance for residents, while the Law Director clarified future public comment opportunities under the Council’s agenda format.
  • Council reviewed a Planning Commission-approved application for a lot split and related variances at 6958 Som Center Road, noted the applicant’s agreement to Planning and Engineering department conditions, and moved to pass the variances consistent with similar prior approvals in the ward.
  • Council reviewed a Planning Commission-approved side yard setback variance for a garage addition at 34091 Somerset Drive, noting the conditions tied to planning and engineering memos, the required professional survey, and the applicants’ agreement to those requirements.
  • A resident described how a garage fire led to plans for a three-bay rebuild, emphasized respect for zoning rules and voluntary revisions to lessen impacts, and explained their request for a side setback variance to allow a functional addition within the lot’s constraints.
  • A resident explained revisions to a proposed garage addition variance, citing the lot’s unique shape, reduced and repositioned footprint, and a proactively added fire-rated exterior wall to enhance safety for an adjacent property.
  • A resident summarized revisions to a proposed third-bay garage addition, highlighting reduced dimensions and improved design, strong neighbor support, and added security benefits while asking Council to approve the setback variance based on the lot’s unique layout and the project’s thoughtful concessions.
  • Council members and the Mayor discussed precedent and alternative design options for a proposed garage addition, with Council Member Zelwin warning about litigation risks if a near-identical neighboring variance were treated differently, another speaker questioning reliance on variances over zoning changes, Council Member Laubscher citing neighborhood conformity and neighbor support, and Mayor Kraus backing approval as part of the city’s effort to accommodate building on nonconforming lots.
  • Council voted to approve a 10‑foot side yard building setback variance at 34091 Somerset Drive, with one council member voting no and the Mayor confirming the motion passed.
  • The Vice Chair of the Charter Review Committee requested that Council amend the master plan update date to 2029, citing planning staff workload and proposing a citizen land use advisory committee in the interim, while the Law Director outlined the need for a formal motion to change the ordinance date.
  • Council Member Zelwin moved to amend the master plan ordinance to reflect a 2029 date as requested by the Charter Review Committee.
  • The Vice Chair of the Charter Review Committee requested that the charter changes be tabled until a full council was present, and the Law Director clarified that the hearing on the item would remain open, the ordinance would stay on the agenda, and no vote would be taken that night.
  • A speaker questioned why the Charter Review Commission had not sought broader citizen input on proposed charter changes and warned that a residential zoning amendment could let a simple Council majority rezone property without sufficient checks and balances from residents.
  • A longtime resident expressed concern that proposed residential‑to‑residential zoning charter changes could undermine the city’s one‑acre lot standard, increase density and variance requests, strain infrastructure, and negatively affect community aesthetics and property values, urging that the provision be omitted from the ballot.
  • A resident with long ties to Solon questioned assurances that proposed charter changes would not affect a nearby 32‑acre property, argued that removing the ward veto would strip neighbors of a say over potential multifamily zoning there, and urged the city to partner with the Western Reserve Land Conservancy and Metro Parks to preserve the land as accessible green space.
  • A longtime resident emphasized the importance of zoning to Solon property owners, cited past development controversies, and urged Council to retain the ward veto and engage citizens more before moving forward with proposed charter changes.
  • A speaker publicly thanked a Ward 2 resident for committing ongoing monetary donations to a community cause and moved that Council accept the donation under suspension.
  • A speaker thanked the Charter Review Committee for addressing master plan and staffing capacity issues and looked forward to collaborating on the Land Use Advisory Committee, while Mayor Kraus congratulated Assistant Chief Steve Sheeback on retiring after 30 years and recognized their significant contributions to the department’s growth and facilities.
  • Charter Commission member Elizabeth Kalinowski addressed Council to explain the commission’s support for eliminating the ward veto, arguing it gave some residents disproportionate voting power based on ward boundaries and that decisions should reflect the best interests of the city as a whole.
  • A resident asked for clarification on what it meant that an amendment had been tabled, and the Law Director offered to explain privately after the meeting as Mayor Kraus invited the next speaker forward.
  • Mayor Kraus relayed a community gardener’s concerns about the City’s use of mothballs at the community garden, citing expert warnings about health and environmental risks and federal pesticide rules, and requested plot fee refunds and future credits, soil testing and remediation, gardener-led management with City support, and stronger safeguards to protect residents in city spaces.
  • A speaker remarked on the lack of visible celebration for the 250th anniversary of the Fourth of July and strongly defended the ward veto as a necessary protection that should give residents closest to proposed changes greater voting weight than the rest of the city.
  • Mayor Kraus relayed a nearby resident’s plea to keep the ward veto and place it on the ballot, warning that its removal could open a Som Center Road property to multifamily development despite past assurances it would remain undeveloped, and urging that the land be preserved as open, safe park space given existing traffic hazards.
  • A resident opposed both the ward veto change and a proposed charter amendment that would allow Council alone to rezone residential property (such as single‑family to multifamily), citing their own due diligence when buying a home, warning that neighbors could sell and rezone acreage without broader resident input, and urging Council to rescind the proposal and seek a better‑discussed solution that would truly address underlying concerns.
  • A longtime resident and former Charter Review Committee member opposed abolishing the ward veto, urged a master plan that would cap development once enough green space was lost, and described perceived deterioration in property upkeep and zoning enforcement that they hoped the city would reverse.
  • Mayor Kraus closed the public hearing and audience comments, lightly joked about earlier remarks, and ended by wishing Councilman Banner a happy birthday.
  • Council Member Zelwin clarified that no rezoning requests or development plans for the Som Center Road property had come before them or the Planning Commission, and Mayor Kraus ended further discussion on the topic.
  • A speaker reported growing community concerns about e-bikes, noted existing state regulations by bike class, and suggested revisiting local rules—potentially including stricter standards and helmet requirements—while inviting Chief Perkins to weigh in.
  • Police Chief Perkins supported potential helmet legislation for e-bike riders, explained that existing laws already allowed enforcement of violations within current staffing limits, and called for a partnership with parents and the community to help address safety concerns without relying solely on ticketing youth.
  • Mayor Kraus reiterated that Council had already voted to place the ward veto issue on the ballot so all residents could vote on it.
  • Law Director Lobe explained that the police and fire chiefs, the Law Department, schools, and Metro Parks had been coordinating for months on responses to growing e‑bike issues—including helmets and speed enforcement—and praised the chiefs for proactively leading that effort.
Your Governments
Your governments list is empty.