Springfield's TIF Funding and Vacancy Appointment Debates

The council discusses additional legal services for CWLP's landfill issues, considers the financial implications of TIF funding for a downtown project, and debates the process for city vacancy appointments. 20mins

Economic Development Environment Immigration Municipal Services Public Safety & Police
Was this helpful?

Original Meeting

Tuesday, January 28th, 2025
7065.0
Committee of the Whole Meeting Tuesday January 28 2025
Full Meeting on YouTube
avatar
Brian Wojcicki
Springfield, Illinois
Government Relations & Legal Services Professional
View full bio
In This Video
  • An ordinance authorizing additional payment to Aaron Fox LLP for legal services related to coal combustion residual regulations is introduced and motioned for debate at the next city council meeting.
  • Alderman Williams inquires about the ordinance's association with previous legal expenses. CWLP Regulatory Affairs Director clarifies the ordinance's purpose and explains the need for additional funds due to increased workload with the USEPA.
  • Alderwoman Notariano asks for more details on the 'numerous requests' mentioned in the ordinance. CWLP Regulatory Affairs Director elaborates on the back-and-forth with regulatory agencies.
  • Alderman Gregory seeks clarification on the landfill's compliance status with the federal EPA, and CWLP Regulatory Affairs Director explains that while they disagree with the federal EPA interpretation, they will comply with the federal compliance requests.
  • Discussion begins on an ordinance amending the appointment procedure for vacancies in the offices of mayor, city treasurer, or city clerk. Alderman Gregory asks about temporary service of executive office staff before completing the procedure for filling vacancies.
  • Alderwoman Notariano argues for the importance of having professional staff to manage offices during vacancies.
  • Alderman Donelan acknowledges the discussion and suggests tweaking the ordinance to make it more acceptable, emphasizing the need for a clear process.
  • Alderman Gregory suggests using the upcoming week to gather suggestions and decide whether to hold the ordinance based on further input next week.
  • Alderman Carlson and Alderman Gregory clarify their positions on whether to hold the ordinance, with Gregory advocating for gathering more input before making a decision.
  • Corporation Counsel clarifies voting rules, explaining the requirements for committee and council actions.
  • Alderwoman Notariano and corporation counsel discuss the implications of present votes as an affirmative vote on most ordinances and resolutions.
  • The meeting proceeds with the introduction of a TIF ordinance for a downtown property at 4th and Adams.
  • Alderman Hanauer raises concerns about the percentage of TIF funding for a redevelopment project, with corporation counsel and Economic Development Director clarifying that there is no set maximum.
  • Alderwoman Notariano discusses the lack of a fixed percentage for TIF funding, emphasizing the need to evaluate projects based on their potential value to the community.
  • Mr. Haxel introduces himself as the owner seeking the TIF request and explains the financial aspects of the project, including the percentage of TIF funding requested and the impact of increased construction costs.
  • Alderman Gregory asks about the tax revenue implications of the project, and Mr. Haxel provides estimates from the assessor's office. Alderman Gregory expresses his support for the project and case-by-case review of TIF projects.
  • Corporation Counsel explains the TIF Act's requirements for council members with property interests in TIF districts to recuse themselves from discussions and votes, addressing concerns raised by Alderman Gregory and others.
  • Mr. Robert Frazier provides an update on the Clean Slate Advocate Soap to Hope program, highlighting its impact and the challenges faced.
  • Mr. Frazier discusses the bureaucratic challenges and the slow progress in securing support for the Clean Slate Advocate program.
  • Continued discussion on the availability of funds for the Clean Slate Advocate program and the need to navigate federal regulations.
  • Chief of Police provides on the overlap of state and federal immigration law enforcement and public safety directives.
  • Chief of Police explains the jurisdictional boundaries of local, state, and federal laws, and the importance of not compromising ongoing investigations, highlighting ongoing massage parlor investigations.
Your Governments
Your governments list is empty.
Manage Your List
More from this government
Massage Parlor Enforcement Questioned; Domestic Violence Plea
Dec 9, 2025
Urban League Land Sale Faces Hold Request
Dec 2, 2025
Community Aid and Calls for Landlord Accountability
Nov 25, 2025
Springfield City Council
Nearby governments
Sangamon County Board
Springfield District 186 Board of Education
Sangamon Mass Transit District Board of Trustees