Raises, Living Wage Debate, and Lyons Farm Crowding

The Durham Public Schools Board of Education debates new salary schedules for teachers and classified staff, balancing urgency around raises with a push toward a higher living wage and future review in committee, then turns to overcrowding at Lyons Farm Elementary by approving modular classrooms and tying them to forthcoming boundary discussions. 52mins

Was this helpful?

Original Meeting

Tuesday, July 21st, 2026
8796.0
#DPSCommunity | DPS Board of Education Special Called Meeting | 7/21/26
Video Notes

#DPSCommunity | DPS Board of Education Special Called Meeting | 7/21/26

Neighborhood news guy for Southpoint Access in Durham.
View full bio
In This Video
  • Chief Finance Officer Jeremy Teetor outlined plans to implement district pay changes ahead of state timelines, detailing July payroll dates and updates for bus drivers, substitute teachers, and year-round school staff.
  • Chief Finance Officer Teetor reviewed recent statewide teacher raise patterns and explained that a budget change newly allowed Durham Public Schools to access the Low Wealth Supplement, outlining plans to convert the eventual allocation into per-teacher bonuses.
  • Chief Finance Officer Teetor outlined state-mandated minimum 3% raises and tiered bonuses for classified employees, including additional funds directed to custodial and school nutrition staff through a statewide student-focused funding program.
  • Chief Finance Officer Teeter reported that the district received nearly $10.9 million in continuation funding tied to state-driven salary and benefit impacts and emphasized that expanded funding requests were primarily focused on classified employee compensation based on extensive staff and public input.
  • Chief Finance Officer Teetor explained that county expansion funds of $2.65 million were committed toward raising classified employee pay with a district match to reach a minimum wage of $18.22 per hour, alongside $1 million in capital outlay for technology upgrades and the development of further compensation materials.
  • Chief Finance Officer Teetor detailed a $7.5 million classified pay initiative built from continuation and expansion funds, explaining updated salary scales that combined a roughly 9.43% raise with restored step increases so employees could again advance their pay with each year of experience.
  • Chief Finance Officer Teetor explained how predominantly salaried employees’ pay was converted to hourly rates under Fair Labor Standards Act rules and detailed that a prior scale’s calculation error produced a $16.65 hourly rate instead of the intended $17.15.
  • Chief Finance Officer Teetor clarified that salaried employees received their advertised monthly pay despite confusion over implied hourly wages and illustrated that a custodian moving from step zero to step one on the new scale would see a raise of just under 10%.
  • Board Member Gabrielle Rivero raised concerns about avoiding past budget and payroll problems, prompting Board Member Rogers, Chief Finance Officer Teetor, and Superintendent Dr. Anthony Lewis to describe safeguards, upgraded systems, and testing intended to prevent future pay errors and funding issues.
  • Board Member Rivero moved to send the proposed salary schedules to the Finance Committee for further analysis and community input, including time for educators to review and use a new salary calculation tool before board approval.
  • Chair Joy Harrell Goff summarized the motion to send salary schedules to the Finance Committee before the August meeting, and Board Member Natalie Bent Kitaif asked whether employees would advance two steps to account for a missed raise year or continue with the standard single-step progression.
  • Superintendent Lewis and Board Member Wendell Tabb emphasized the need to avoid further delays in paying staff, stressing that employees were tired of waiting for raises while still supporting public access to a new salary tool and consistent scrutiny of future board decisions.
  • Board Member Millicent Rogers explained opposition to delaying approval of the salary schedules, citing unscheduled Finance Committee meetings, scheduling conflicts before the August work session, and a preference for the full board—not just a committee—to address questions and concerns about the plan.
  • Board Member Rivero explained hesitancy to approve the new salary schedules immediately, calling for the Finance Committee to take more time to analyze recent state and county funding changes, explore alternatives to the proposed $18.22 hourly rate, and return with a fully vetted recommendation to the board.
  • Board Member Nadeen Bir supported aligning pay with the district’s living wage policy while warning about salary compression and backing a Finance Committee review that would delay raises but not paychecks, as Board Member Tabb voiced concern that another committee process could prolong long‑running problems with staff not seeing timely pay increases.
  • Board Members Bent Kitaif and Rogers, Vice Chair Xavier Cason, Superintendent Lewis, and Chief Finance Officer Teetor discussed balancing community calls to slow down and review new pay scales with a desire to implement July raises immediately, including ideas for back pay and exploring whether funds could support a higher minimum wage than $18.22 per hour.
  • Chief Finance Officer Teetor clarified that approving the current salary scales would still allow the board to make retroactive pay adjustments later in the year if authorized.
  • Board Member Tabb voiced support for pursuing the ‘both‑and’ approach, recommending that the board both move raises forward and continue working together on longer‑term solutions for staff pay.
  • Board Member Bent Kitaif cautioned against approving salary schedules and revisiting them later in ways that might reduce raises, questioning where additional funds would come from to increase the minimum wage to $18.22 or $19.22 per hour without reallocating money from other staff.
  • Board Member Rogers questioned whether the district’s pay goal should be the $19.22 living wage or the county’s minimum employee wage under board policy and suggested requesting updated figures from the county manager, while Board Member Bir noted that the required July 1 wage update had not yet been provided.
  • Board Member Rivero cautioned that fully allocating the $7.5 million to the proposed salary schedules would leave no remaining funds to raise the minimum wage to $19.22, warning that any further increases would require uncertain additional funding from outside sources.
  • Board Member Rogers asked whether Durham Public Schools could limit some classified staff to the state’s 3% raise and how that would affect long‑term pay compression, and Chief Finance Officer Teeter responded that past uneven increases had already contributed to compression and that the proposed $7.5 million plan was designed to exceed the minimum while avoiding further imbalance.
  • Chair Harrell Goff reiterated the board’s desire to both move raises forward and pursue a $19.22 living wage but highlighted uncertainty about funding and explained that an amended motion—or a vote on the existing motion—would be needed to reach a compromise.
  • Board Member Rivero asked whether the board could approve certified salary schedules separately from classified schedules, prompting Chief Finance Officer Teetor and others to weigh in on the feasibility and leading Chair Harrell Goff to clarify that any delay would postpone raises but not regular paychecks.
  • Superintendent Lewis and another speaker cautioned that delaying approval of classified salary schedules would defer raises for the district’s lowest-paid workers and noted that state-funded non-certified employees were legally entitled to a 3% increase effective July 1, raising concerns about how long such pay could be withheld.
  • Board Member Rogers proposed approving certified salary schedules and a 3% raise for classified staff in July while sending broader local increases back to the Finance Committee, and Chief Finance Officer Teetor confirmed the approach was technically possible but flagged the need to clarify step increases and substitute pay rates.
  • Board Member Tabb and Vice Chair Cason expressed concern that separating out a 3% classified raise could complicate pay decisions and damage trust, urging the board to avoid returning to past confusion while still pursuing a path toward a higher living wage.
  • Superintendent Lewis urged the board not to make staff wait for raises, noting a previously approved superintendent raise, and Chair Harrell Goff announced that the motion on the floor failed, requiring a new motion.
  • Chair Harrell Goff restated and confirmed a motion with Chief Finance Officer Teetor and Board Member Rogers to approve the amended salary schedules—including setting before- and after-care pay at $18.22—and send the $19.22 minimum wage discussion to the Aug. 19 Finance Committee meeting, which then passed on a 4–3 vote.
  • Board Member Rogers asked detailed questions about a Southwest Elementary paving project—including scope, timing, and bidding through the WMBE process—and a speaker explained that the comprehensive work, addressing play areas, ADA accessibility, and safety concerns, required separate approval and was awarded to the low bidder committed to completing it before school starts.
  • Chair Harrell Goff announced that the motion by Board Member Rogers, seconded by Board Member Rivero, to approve parking lot asphalt paving at Southwest Elementary School passed unanimously.
  • Devan Mitchell, director of school planning for DPS, explained that Lyons Farm Elementary needed six modular classrooms and a modular restroom building because enrollment had already exceeded the school’s 584‑student design capacity, with projected enrollment reaching up to 686 students.
  • Director Mitchell described overcrowding at Lyons Farm Elementary, explained that multiple options were studied before recommending new modular classrooms, and requested board approval to begin the design process so modular units could be ordered and installed in time for relief by fall 2027.
  • Board Member Rogers voiced concern about approving Lyons Farm modular classroom design before broader right-sizing work, noting the request’s late arrival, limited community engagement, and unclear data on how boundary changes would affect families.
  • Superintendent Lewis explained that Lyons Farm’s rapid neighborhood growth and past under-sizing of the building made new modular classrooms necessary alongside future right-sizing work, emphasizing the 12–15 month lead time as the reason the request was brought forward now.
  • Board Member Bir and district staff described Lyons Farm Elementary as already maxed out, using hallways and specialized rooms for instruction, and explained that modular classrooms were selected after extensive review of program and boundary options, warning that other measures would be needed to relieve overcrowding if the modular plan was not approved.
  • Board Member Bir asked about safety amid overcrowding at Lyons Farm Elementary, and Director Mitchell explained that staff had adjusted instructional areas after site walks to ensure student and staff safety, while noting that capacity challenges remained an ongoing problem.
  • Board Member Rivero described severe overcrowding and safety concerns at Lyons Farm Elementary, including classrooms under stairwells and loss of media and resource spaces, and confirmed with Director Mitchell that the proposed modular units were intended as an interim solution ahead of a future building addition.
  • Board Member Bent Kitaif asked whether new modular units at Lyons Farm could be reused elsewhere in the district, and Director Mitchell confirmed that modulars were used at multiple sites and could later replace aging units such as those housing bus program staff.
  • Board Members Tabb and Chief Operating Officer Kenneth Barnes discussed safety and overcrowding at Lyons Farm Elementary, emphasizing that modular classrooms alone would not resolve long-term growth and that both new units and boundary adjustments were needed to address current and future capacity problems.
  • The board unanimously approved the Lyons Farm Elementary Learning Village classroom expansion while directing boundary and overcrowding discussions to the Facilities Committee, then voted to convene in closed session and ended the public meeting.
Your Governments
Your governments list is empty.